Built on what water made
The builders used the natural travertine barriers as piers.
Anil Öztas — CC BY-SA 4.0 · APneunzehn74 — CC BY-SA 4.0 · Sopina Ana — CC BY-SA 4.0 · Sopina Ana — CC BY-SA 4.0
An old stone bridge over the Krupa river in inland Croatia, crossing a chain of waterfalls and pools for about a hundred metres on some twenty small arches. How it was built is what distinguishes it. The bridge is dry limestone laid without mortar, on a foundation of travertine — rock that forms naturally as calcium precipitates out of running water. Local craftsmen built it in the eighteenth century using the river's natural travertine barriers as piers, which is to say they built on what the water had made rather than against it. The travertine itself is a living process: it continues to form and slowly changes the shape of the falls across decades, the same system that produced the famous Plitvice lakes not far away. The bridge was a pack route linking inland villages, and goods were carried across it on donkeys for centuries. Decisive practical points: reaching it needs a walk of about thirty to sixty minutes from the nearest parking on an unpaved path. The stones are permanently slippery and the bridge has no railings. The area is remote with no facilities and no reliable phone coverage.
The builders used the natural travertine barriers as piers.
Travertine keeps growing and reshapes the falls across decades.
The famous Plitvice lakes are a product of the same process.
The Krupa river, southern Velebit
Running water in limestone country carries dissolved calcium. At certain points — faster flow, water plants, algae — carbon dioxide leaves the water and calcium precipitates onto any surface, including the algae and twigs themselves. The deposit builds layer on layer into a barrier that rises slowly and dams a pool behind it. Repeated, that produces a chain of stepped pools and falls. The process is slow but continuous, which is why these sites are living systems rather than fixed formations.
If you like remote, lightly visited places, yes — it is among the finest things in inland Croatia and far quieter than Plitvice. But it needs a car, a walk and deliberate intent. If your time on the coast is short, Plitvice or Krka are easier and more spectacular, though far more crowded.
Sign in to write your review of this place.
No reviews yet — be the first.